{"id":104120,"date":"2017-07-19T11:30:28","date_gmt":"2017-07-19T15:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depquebec.com\/?p=104120\/"},"modified":"2017-07-19T11:39:04","modified_gmt":"2017-07-19T15:39:04","slug":"all-signs-indicate-that-quebecs-2014-tobacco-tax-hike-fueled-contraband","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depquebec.com\/en\/all-signs-indicate-that-quebecs-2014-tobacco-tax-hike-fueled-contraband\/","title":{"rendered":"All Signs Indicate That Quebec’s 2014 Tobacco Tax Hike Fueled Contraband"},"content":{"rendered":"
Just a few months after being elected in June 2014, the Liberal government of Philippe Couillard adopted a mini-budget to help improve public finances which were deemed in a sorry state after a year and a half of PQ governement and especially, of course, 9 years, 4 months and 21 days of tumultuous Liberal rule under Jean Charest.<\/p>\n
Among the various measures announced, the new Finance Minister, Carlos Leitao, went for a tobacco tax increase of $ 0.50 per pack of cigarettes<\/a>, or $ 4 a carton.<\/p>\n The measure, it was said, would accomplish two main objectives:<\/p>\n As for the risk of fueling contraband, the government rejected it, saying it was in decline and largely under control, declining from 30% to about 14% according to its estimate.<\/p>\n Three years later, what about these predictions?<\/p>\n Has the tax hike really delivered promised incomes and lowered smoking without encouraging contraband?<\/p>\n We highly doubt it.<\/p>\n The figures indicate, on the contrary, that this was a very bad deal for both government revenues AND public health.<\/p>\n Overstatement of projected revenues<\/strong><\/p>\n First, the minister was far too optimistic in his predictions of rising incomes, a sign of naivety on his part.<\/p>\n The reason for this disapointing outcome is simple: the decline in smokers far exceeded the planned 50,000.<\/p>\n But is it because the latter have stopped their ugly habit or rather because they have turned to a new source of supply which is, shall we say, a lot cheaper and a bit illegal?<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n